Alberta’s top court reduces parole ineligibilities in three multiple murder cases

By The Canadian Press

Alberta’s top court has reduced the parole eligibilities in three high-profile multiple murder cases to bring them in line with a recent Supreme Court of Canada ruling.

Last month the top court struck down the Criminal Code provision that meant multiple murderers might have to wait 50 years or more to apply for parole, calling it degrading and incompatible with human dignity.

The unanimous high court decision came in the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, who fatally shot six people at a Quebec City mosque in 2017.

The ruling meant he can seek parole after 25 years instead of having to wait 40 years as determined by the judge in the original trial.


Related Article: Some Alberta murderers could be on the streets sooner than thought due to Supreme Court of Canada ruling


The Alberta Court of Appeal followed suit on Friday, applying the new standard in three separate murder cases.
Joshua Frank and Jason Klaus were each convicted of three counts of first-degree murder after the bodies of Klaus’s father and sister were discovered in their burnt-out farmhouse near Red Deer, Alta., in 2013.

His mother’s body was never found.

They were ordered to serve 50 years before applying for release.

Edward Downey killed Sara Baillie and her five-year-old daughter, Taliyah Marsman, in Calgary in 2016. He was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and given a life sentence with no chance of parole for 50 years.

Derek Saretzky was convicted on three counts of first-degree murder in the 2015 deaths of Terry Blanchette, his two-year-old daughter, Hailey Dunbar-Blanchette; and neighbour Hanne Meketech in Blairmore, Alta. He was given a life sentence with no chance of parole for 75 years.


Related Article: Quebec mosque disappointed with ruling allowing shooter to seek parole after 25 years


In a recent interview, Saretzky’s lawyer said the court’s move gives his client hope and a chance at rehabilitation.

“I felt what was wrong about the law, in particular Saretzky’s sentence, was that he was 22 at the time of the offence and so to give a 75-year, no-parole (sentence) just means it’s taken away all hope from this young man,” said Balfour Der.

“You’re predicting the future that he could never be rehabilitated.”

All four men had appealed their sentences. They are now all eligible to apply for parole after 25 years.

Top Stories

Top Stories

Most Watched Today